Skip to content

apache/maka

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
5,398
Activity since
2026
Latest activity
Sep 2026

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+113
Last 90 days
+125
Actions / day
1.4
Public star actions

stars from June 14, 2026 to September 15, 2026, peaking at 128.128 STARS3 MO128SEP 2026JUN 2026

128 stars on September 15, 2026.

stars by date
Datestars
June 14, 20261
June 16, 20263
June 21, 20264
June 22, 20265
June 24, 20266
July 3, 202612
July 4, 202615
September 4, 202618
September 5, 202648
September 6, 202674
September 7, 202678
September 8, 202679
September 9, 202682
September 10, 202685
September 11, 202696
September 12, 2026106
September 13, 2026115
September 14, 2026121
September 15, 2026128

Observed activity milestones: 100 around Sep 2026

The commit history reads apache/maka a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for apache/maka
File change frequency
File change frequency for apache/maka
Bus factor
Bus factor for apache/maka
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for apache/maka
Contributors
Contributors for apache/maka
Language activity
Language activity for apache/maka
Commit activity
Commit activity for apache/maka
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for apache/maka

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for apache/maka.

Notes on apache/maka

How many stars does apache/maka have?
GitHub currently reports 5,398 stars for apache/maka. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for maka?
gitdebt observed about 125 public star actions for apache/maka over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 113 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present.
Is maka still active?
Public archive data shows about 113 star actions for apache/maka in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was maka created?
apache/maka was created on May 27, 2026. The first public star activity observed for apache/maka is from Jun 2026.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · apache/maka star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/apache/maka?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/apache/maka/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="apache/maka star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/apache/maka/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through September 15, 2026 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/apache/maka?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.