How many stars does gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage have?

GitHub currently reports 35 stars for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.

What does recent star activity look like for gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage?

gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.

Is gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage still active?

Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.

When was gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage created?

gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage was created on June 15, 2022. The first public star activity observed for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage is from Oct 2022.

gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub

Current stars: 35
Activity since: 2022
Latest activity: Jan 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days: +1
Last 90 days: +1
Actions / day: 0.0

Public star actions

FromTo

stars by date
Date	stars
October 3, 2022	1
October 7, 2022	2
October 18, 2022	3
October 24, 2022	14
October 25, 2022	28
October 26, 2022	31
October 31, 2022	34
November 8, 2022	35
February 6, 2023	36
January 4, 2025	37

The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.

The commit history reads gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Fix-labelled changes

File change frequency for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — File change frequency

Bus factor for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Bus factor

Maintenance pulse for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Maintenance pulse

Contributors for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Contributors

Language activity for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Language activity

Commit activity for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Commit activity

Recent TODO/FIXME movement for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage — Recent TODO/FIXME movement

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage.

Notes on gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage

How many stars does gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage have?: GitHub currently reports 35 stars for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage?: gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
Is gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage still active?: Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage created?: gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage was created on June 15, 2022. The first public star activity observed for gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage is from Oct 2022.

Read gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage against a neighbour

comparison builder

Compare with any repository

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage star history

<a href="https://gitdebt.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through January 4, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-kontent-ai-homepage?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.