Skip to content

redwoodjs/studio

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
10
Activity since
2024
Latest activity
Jul 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from January 21, 2024 to July 24, 2025, peaking at 9.9 STARS1 YR 6 MO9JUL 2025JAN 2024

9 stars on July 24, 2025.

stars by date
Datestars
January 21, 20241
February 12, 20242
February 21, 20244
March 26, 20245
October 21, 20246
November 7, 20247
December 17, 20248
July 24, 20259

The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.

The commit history reads redwoodjs/studio a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for redwoodjs/studio
File change frequency
File change frequency for redwoodjs/studio
Bus factor
Bus factor for redwoodjs/studio
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for redwoodjs/studio
Contributors
Contributors for redwoodjs/studio
Language activity
Language activity for redwoodjs/studio
Commit activity
Commit activity for redwoodjs/studio
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for redwoodjs/studio

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for redwoodjs/studio.

Notes on redwoodjs/studio

How many stars does redwoodjs/studio have?
GitHub currently reports 10 stars for redwoodjs/studio. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for studio?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for redwoodjs/studio over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
Is studio still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for redwoodjs/studio in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was studio created?
redwoodjs/studio was created on September 20, 2023. The first public star activity observed for redwoodjs/studio is from Jan 2024.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · redwoodjs/studio star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/studio?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/studio/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="redwoodjs/studio star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/studio/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through July 24, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/studio?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.