Skip to content

jgthms/bulma vs twbs/bootstrap

  • jgthms/bulma

    Stars

    50,058

    First recorded star in 2016.

  • twbs/bootstrap

    Stars

    174,804

    First recorded star in 2011.

Star history overlay

207k STARS15 YR 1 MOjgthms/bulma57ktwbs/bootstrap207k

jgthms/bulma: 57,229 stars on September 15, 2026. twbs/bootstrap: 207,220 stars on September 14, 2026.

Star history for jgthms/bulma
DateStars
January 24, 20162
March 8, 20165838
April 22, 20166369
June 6, 20166910
July 21, 20167391
September 4, 20169173
October 19, 20169947
December 2, 201610926
January 16, 201712192
March 2, 201713809
April 25, 201715514
June 9, 201716887
July 24, 201718409
September 6, 201720074
October 21, 201721711
December 5, 201723909
January 19, 201825272
March 5, 201826674
April 20, 201827903
June 3, 201829128
July 18, 201830191
September 1, 201831413
October 16, 201832377
November 30, 201833369
January 14, 201934249
February 27, 201935285
April 13, 201936359
May 28, 201937287
July 12, 201938171
August 26, 201938936
October 19, 201939884
December 2, 201940536
January 16, 202041193
March 1, 202041858
April 15, 202042590
May 30, 202043433
July 14, 202044079
August 28, 202044709
October 12, 202045310
November 26, 202045854
January 10, 202146346
February 24, 202146958
April 10, 202147515
May 27, 202147912
July 11, 202148353
August 28, 202148729
October 13, 202149042
December 5, 202149352
January 19, 202249719
March 4, 202250069
April 27, 202250455
June 11, 202250759
July 26, 202251022
September 9, 202251344
October 24, 202251625
December 8, 202251925
January 23, 202352194
March 9, 202352511
April 23, 202352793
June 7, 202353001
July 22, 202353218
September 5, 202353424
October 22, 202353621
December 8, 202353801
January 23, 202454011
March 8, 202454250
April 23, 202454934
June 6, 202455182
July 21, 202455443
September 5, 202455792
October 30, 202456101
December 15, 202456259
February 1, 202556443
March 17, 202556635
May 2, 202556789
June 25, 202556912
August 23, 202557014
November 8, 202557094
January 22, 202657174
September 15, 202657229
Star history for twbs/bootstrap
DateStars
August 19, 2011972
October 22, 20117715
December 26, 201111625
March 1, 201219467
November 15, 201223508
January 19, 201327064
March 25, 201331814
May 29, 201335890
August 2, 201340503
October 6, 201345340
December 23, 201349454
February 26, 201452674
May 2, 201455829
July 6, 201458648
September 8, 201461616
November 12, 201465082
January 16, 201568137
March 22, 201571552
May 26, 201574912
July 30, 201578405
October 3, 201582552
December 7, 201585996
February 11, 201689370
April 16, 201692763
June 20, 201695973
August 24, 201699200
October 28, 2016103308
December 31, 2016106490
March 6, 2017110919
May 10, 2017114861
July 27, 2017118680
September 30, 2017122394
December 4, 2017126230
February 7, 2018130002
April 14, 2018132991
June 18, 2018135480
August 22, 2018137603
October 26, 2018139708
December 30, 2018141676
March 5, 2019143989
May 8, 2019146680
July 12, 2019148927
September 15, 2019150861
November 19, 2019152752
January 23, 2020154747
March 28, 2020156737
June 1, 2020159285
August 5, 2020162268
October 10, 2020164125
December 14, 2020165985
March 2, 2021169759
May 6, 2021171556
July 13, 2021173990
September 18, 2021175688
November 27, 2021176951
January 31, 2022178696
April 6, 2022180383
June 10, 2022182526
August 14, 2022184103
October 18, 2022185697
December 22, 2022187067
February 25, 2023188677
May 1, 2023190356
July 5, 2023192225
September 8, 2023193399
November 12, 2023194533
January 15, 2024195537
March 20, 2024196734
May 24, 2024197859
July 28, 2024199114
October 14, 2024201915
December 18, 2024202944
February 21, 2025203817
April 27, 2025204906
July 1, 2025205498
September 4, 2025206258
November 16, 2025206622
January 20, 2026206888
April 6, 2026207085
September 14, 2026207220

Repository health compared

Live analysis · unavailable data stays labelled

Popularity is only one axis. Compare technical scale, maintenance cadence, ownership resilience and change pressure against the same completed analysis that sits behind each report.

Reach

Popularity and real-world adoption

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
GitHub starsCurrent public GitHub metadata total.50,058Best result in this row: 174,804
Stars gained · trailing 90dChange in the newest 90 days covered by each cached series.+12Best result in this row: +60
ForksCurrent public GitHub metadata total.Not availableNot available
Largest package audienceLargest resolved registry total; sources are shown explicitly.No resolved packageNo resolved package
Repository ageElapsed years since the GitHub creation timestamp.11 years15 years

Codebase

Size and technical center of gravity

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Dominant languageLargest share of analyzed code lines at current HEAD.Not availableNot available
Code linesAnalyzed source lines at current HEAD, excluding blanks and comments.Not availableNot available
Languages representedLanguages with non-zero files or line counts.Not availableNot available

Maintenance

Commit volume and recent operating cadence

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Repository commitsFull repository commit total reported by the analysis.Not availableNot available
Commits · trailing 90dCommit count in the newest 90 days covered by the repository analysis.Not availableNot available

Ownership

How broadly maintenance responsibility is distributed

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Bus factorFewest analyzed contributors carrying at least half the commits.Not availableNot available
Top contributor concentrationShare of attributed commits carried by the most active contributor.Not availableNot available

Change signals

Debt markers and fix pressure in frequently changed files

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Fix-labelled share · frequently changed filesFix-labelled commits divided by commits across the analyzed high-frequency file set.Not availableNot available
Recent TODO/FIXME movementLatest cumulative marker count and its change over the trailing 90 days.Not availableNot available

Both curves are drawn on shared axes. They are not drawn from a shared source: each series names its own below.

One axis, two sources

The overlay puts both repositories on one axis. It does not put them on one source: since July 2026 a stargazer-list series stops on a fixed date, while a series rebuilt from public archive events keeps receiving points. Each column below states its own reading.

How the star series for jgthms/bulma and twbs/bootstrap were read
Fieldjgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
SourceHistorical star dataHistorical star data
CoverageCovers through September 15, 2026Covers through September 14, 2026
StateStill updatingStill updating

No row states how much of a history is missing. An archive series records star actions and not unstars, so it can exceed a repository's own star total, and a figure for the difference would be wrong exactly where it looks most precise.

Notes on this comparison

  • Which has more GitHub stars, jgthms/bulma or twbs/bootstrap?

    GitHub reports 174,804 stars for twbs/bootstrap and 50,058 for jgthms/bulma.

  • Do both star histories cover the same period?

    Not necessarily, and each chart names its own. jgthms/bulma — Historical star data · Covers through September 15, 2026 · Still updating. twbs/bootstrap — Historical star data · Covers through September 14, 2026 · Still updating. Since July 2026 GitHub serves a repository's stargazer list only to its own admins and collaborators, so one series can stop on a fixed date while the other keeps flowing from public archive events.

  • How is this comparison computed?

    Star totals come from public repository metadata. The two curves are each repository's stored star series drawn on shared axes, from whichever source is named above. Repository-health figures are computed independently from each project's commit history.