Skip to content

Python data tools: star history compared

NumPy and pandas are the bedrock nearly every data stack is built on, which makes their long, steady star curves a useful baseline: this is what indispensable looks like. Polars is the disruption story — a Rust-core DataFrame library whose growth since 2022 tracks the whole ecosystem's hunger for speed. Arrow and Dask fill in the picture at the memory-format and distributed ends.

Ranked by current GitHub stars · growth = stars gained in the trailing 90 days · data updated Jul 2026

Python data tools — star history

Ranking

5 repositories

#RepositoryStars+90dFirst starHealth
1pandas-dev/pandas49,375~1052011debt charts
2pola-rs/polars39,152~492020debt charts
3numpy/numpy32,470~922011debt charts
4apache/arrow16,968~212016debt charts
5dask/dask13,876~202015debt charts

Decision matrix

Repository health compared

Live Postgres analysis · unavailable data stays labeled

Popularity is only one axis. Compare technical scale, maintenance cadence, ownership resilience, and change pressure using the same completed repository analysis behind each report.

:: Reach

Popularity and real-world adoption

Signalpandas-dev/pandaspola-rs/polarsnumpy/numpyapache/arrowdask/dask
GitHub starsCurrent public GitHub metadata total.49,37539,15232,47016,96813,876
Stars gained · trailing 90dChange in the newest 90 days covered by each cached series.+105+49+92+21+20
ForksCurrent public GitHub metadata total.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Largest package audienceLargest resolved registry total; sources are shown explicitly.No resolved packageNo resolved packageNo resolved packageNo resolved packageNo resolved package
Repository ageElapsed years since the GitHub creation timestamp.16 years6.2 years16 years10 years12 years

:: Codebase

Size and technical center of gravity

Signalpandas-dev/pandaspola-rs/polarsnumpy/numpyapache/arrowdask/dask
Dominant languageLargest share of analyzed code lines at current HEAD.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Code linesAnalyzed source lines at current HEAD, excluding blanks and comments.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Languages representedLanguages with non-zero files or line counts.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available

:: Maintenance

Commit volume and recent operating cadence

Signalpandas-dev/pandaspola-rs/polarsnumpy/numpyapache/arrowdask/dask
Repository commitsFull repository commit total reported by the analysis.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Commits · trailing 90dCommit count in the newest 90 days covered by the repository analysis.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available

:: Ownership

How broadly maintenance responsibility is distributed

Signalpandas-dev/pandaspola-rs/polarsnumpy/numpyapache/arrowdask/dask
Bus factorFewest analyzed contributors carrying at least half the commits.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Top contributor concentrationShare of attributed commits carried by the most active contributor.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available

:: Change signals

Debt markers and fix pressure in frequently changed files

Signalpandas-dev/pandaspola-rs/polarsnumpy/numpyapache/arrowdask/dask
Fix-labelled share · frequently changed filesFix-labelled commits divided by commits across the analyzed high-frequency file set.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Recent TODO/FIXME movementLatest cumulative marker count and its change over the trailing 90 days.Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available

Frequently asked

Which of these python data tools has the most GitHub stars?

pandas-dev/pandas is the most-starred of the python data tools gitdebt compares, with 49,375 GitHub stars as of Jul 2026. It earned its first star in 2011.

Which of these python data tools is growing the fastest?

pandas-dev/pandas added the most stars over the last 90 days of its cached history — about 105 new stars. 90-day figures are approximate for older repos, whose history is downsampled.

How is this comparison computed?

The table ranks public repository metadata by current total stars. When historical stargazer timestamps are available, gitdebt plots their cumulative series on shared axes and estimates trailing 90-day growth. Repo-health charts come independently from each repository's commit history.

Related categories

all categories

Fastest-growing repos across all of gitdebt